Header

Header

Header

DNA Damage & Repair Oligonucleotide Modifications

Custom modified oligonucleotides that model oxidative lesions, alkylated bases, UV-induced damage, abasic-site intermediates and epigenetic oxidation states for BER, NER, MMR, mutagenesis and repair assay development.

8-oxo-dG • 8-oxo-dA • Thymidine Glycol O6-Me-dG • O4-Me-dT • N3-Me-dC CPD • cis-syn TT • UV Damage dSpacer • Pyrrolidine • Abasic II

Design DNA Damage & Repair Oligonucleotides Around Defined Lesions

Bio-Synthesis supports custom lesion-containing oligonucleotides for DNA damage and repair research, including oxidative stress models, alkylation damage, UV photolesions, abasic-site mimics and TET/BER-related cytosine oxidation analogs.

Bio-Synthesis offers a broad portfolio of DNA damage and repair oligonucleotide modifications including oxidative lesions such as 8-oxo-dG and 8-oxo-dA, alkylation damage models including O6-Me-dG and O4-Me-dT, UV-induced lesions such as CPD and cis-syn thymidine dimers, abasic-site mimics including dSpacer and Pyrrolidine, and cytosine oxidation analogs for TET-mediated DNA demethylation studies.

Our team can help with lesion selection, position and density, matched unmodified controls, duplex design, optional handles/spacers, purification, analytical QC and custom packaging for tubes, vials or plate-based repair assays.

Defined Lesion → Repair Pathway → Assay Readout
Lesion oligoRepair enzymeKinetics / incision / bypass

Design DNA Damage Substrates by Lesion Position, Pathway and Controls

DNA damage and repair oligonucleotides are more than modified sequences. Lesion position, opposing base, duplex architecture, pathway choice, controls and analytical verification all affect how the substrate behaves in repair assays.

Select a design topic to view substrate design guidance

Lesion Placement Strategy

Best forBER / NER / TLS
Core decisionposition
Design focusopposing base
Control needmatched duplex

Lesion position determines substrate recognition, cleavage behavior and polymerase bypass outcomes.

Design Element Recommendation Why It Matters Typical Use
Internal Lesion Preferred for most repair assays Provides flanking sequence for repair-enzyme recognition and processing BER, NER, TLS and glycosylase assays
Terminal Lesion Use only for specialized formats Termini can affect nuclease, ligase, polymerase and repair-enzyme behavior Primer-extension or end-specific assays
Defined Opposing Base Specify the base opposite the lesion Opposing-base identity can change repair specificity and miscoding behavior O6-Me-dG, 8-oxo-dG and mismatch studies
Multiple Lesions Space carefully and review manufacturability Clustered lesions can alter duplex stability and pathway choice Radiation damage and clustered repair models

Design note: For most DNA repair substrates, place the lesion away from the ends and include enough flanking sequence for enzyme recognition and assay readout.

Repair Pathway Matching

Best forassay planning
Core decisionpathway
Design focus lesion class
Control needpathway control

Start with the biological repair pathway, then select the lesion and sequence architecture.

Repair Pathway Common Modifications Substrate Design Focus Typical Readout
Base Excision Repair (BER) 8-oxo-dG, 8-oxo-dA, thymidine glycol, dU, dSpacer, Pyrrolidine Single-base lesion, internal placement and matched duplex controls Glycosylase activity, AP incision, gap filling
Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) CPD, cis-syn thymidine dimer and helix-distorting lesions Flanking context and duplex stability Lesion recognition, incision and repair synthesis
Mismatch / Mutagenesis Models O6-Me-dG, O4-Me-dT, N3-Me-dC, etheno dA Defined opposing base and polymerase compatibility Miscoding, bypass and repair specificity
Translesion Synthesis (TLS) O6-Me-dG, 8-oxo-dG, thymidine glycol and oxidative lesions Primer/template design and lesion position relative to primer end Polymerase bypass and extension efficiency
TET / Demethylation Studies 5hmC, 5fC, 5caC Cytosine oxidation series and matched unmodified/5mC controls TDG/BER processing and demethylation pathway analysis

Design note: BER and NER substrates often require different duplex architectures. Pathway choice should guide lesion placement before synthesis.

Controls & Comparators

Best forinterpretation
Core decisioncontrol set
Design focusmatched context
Control needpositive / negative

Repair assays are difficult to interpret without matched lesion-free and pathway-relevant controls.

Control Type Typical Use Design Recommendation Useful For
Matched Unmodified Duplex Baseline comparison Use the same sequence without the lesion Background cleavage, binding and assay signal
Opposing-Base Control Repair specificity Pair the lesion against defined A, C, G or T where relevant O6-Me-dG, 8-oxo-dG and mismatch models
Lesion-Free Competitor Specificity and competition Use identical or related sequence context Enzyme binding, competition and pathway preference
Positive Control Substrate Assay validation Use a known substrate for the enzyme or repair pathway Glycosylase, NER and incision assays
Cluster / Density Control Complex damage models Compare single lesion vs tandem or clustered substrates Radiation damage and pathway competition

Design note: Controls should match sequence context as closely as possible so differences reflect lesion biology rather than sequence or duplex effects.

Analytical & Purification Considerations

Best forrelease planning
Core decisionQC package
Design focuslesion stability
Control needidentity / purity

Specialty lesions may affect chromatographic behavior, mass confirmation and storage conditions.

Method Typical Role When to Use Notes
HPLC / UPLC Purity assessment Most modified oligos and assay substrates Useful for release profile and purification tracking
LC-MS Identity confirmation Compatible lesion chemistries and construct sizes Confirm feasibility for complex or labile lesions
PAGE Size and structural evaluation Duplex substrates, long oligos or difficult chromatograms Can support assay-readout preparation
OD260 / Concentration Quantitation Routine release and normalized panels Extinction coefficient may need review for modified bases
Custom Documentation Project traceability Screening panels or development programs CoA, plate maps, labels and barcode support available

Design note: Analytical strategy should be selected before ordering if the construct contains labile, bulky or multiple specialty lesions.

Advanced Lesion Design

Best forcomplex models
Core decisionlesion architecture
Design focusdensity / spacing
Control needcomparator series

Advanced substrates require careful lesion spacing, sequence review and control-series design.

Study Type Recommended Modifications Design Focus Typical Application
Clustered Oxidative Damage 8-oxo-dG, 8-oxo-dA, thymidine glycol, 5-OH-dU Lesion spacing and strand orientation Radiation damage and BER pathway competition
Tandem Lesion Constructs Multiple oxidative lesions or lesion + AP mimic Manufacturability and duplex stability Complex repair mechanism studies
Cytosine Oxidation Series 5hmC, 5fC, 5caC Matched 5mC and unmodified controls TET-mediated oxidation and demethylation research
AP-Site Processing dSpacer, Pyrrolidine, Abasic II Internal placement and enzyme compatibility BER incision, AP endonuclease and polymerase studies
Panel-Based Assays Multiple lesion classes in normalized format Consistent sequence length, concentration and plate map Repair enzyme screening and genotoxicity panels

Design note: Advanced lesion panels should include matched controls and may benefit from custom plate formatting, concentration normalization and expanded documentation.

Choose the Lesion by the Repair Pathway

Start with the pathway question first, then select the lesion type, sequence context, duplex format and readout method.

Select a repair pathway to view recommended lesions

BER-focused designs typically use single-base lesions or AP-site analogs positioned within duplex oligos.

Recommended Lesions 8-oxo-dG, 8-oxo-dA, dU, thymidine glycol, 5-OH-dU, 5-OH-dC, dSpacer and Pyrrolidine.
Typical Readout Glycosylase activity, AP endonuclease incision, gap filling, polymerase bypass and repair kinetics.
Design Focus Internal placement, matched lesion-free controls, duplex context and enzyme-specific flanking sequence.

NER and UV-damage designs require helix-distorting lesions and sufficient flanking sequence for recognition.

Recommended Lesions CPD, cis-syn thymidine dimer, bulky adduct models and UV-induced lesion controls.
Typical Readout Lesion recognition, dual incision, repair synthesis, ligation-mediated PCR and IPoD-style mapping.
Design Focus Use ≥10 nt flanking context where possible and include undamaged duplex controls.

Mutagenesis and mismatch models test mispairing, polymerase bypass and lesion-specific coding outcomes.

Recommended Lesions O6-Me-dG, O4-Me-dT, N3-Me-dC, etheno dA, 8-amino-dG and 8-amino-dA.
Typical Readout Miscoding, lesion bypass, mismatch processing, polymerase preference and mutagenesis assays.
Design Focus Pair lesion against defined opposing bases and validate ligation/PCR behavior near primer ends.

Sequence context and clustered lesions help test repair pathway choice, radiation damage models and lesion density effects.

Recommended Designs Single lesion, clustered lesions, opposite-strand lesions, matched unmodified controls and competitor substrates.
Typical Readout Repair efficiency, pathway competition, genome stability modeling and genotoxicity response.
Design Focus Review GC-rich vs AT-rich regions, lesion spacing, strand orientation and assay-specific control design.

DNA Damage & Repair Oligo Modification Selector

Use the tabs to compare lesion classes, product options and common applications without forcing customers through a long product catalog.

Select a lesion category to view product options

Oxidized & Cyclopurine Lesions

oxidative stress
BER
lesion position
identity + purity
Category Modification Description Application
Oxidized Base 8-Oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine Oxidized guanine base BER, oxidative DNA damage and glycosylase fidelity
Oxidized Base 8-Oxo-2′-deoxyadenosine Oxidized adenine base Oxidative stress marker and repair assay control
Cyclopurine 8,5′-cyclo-dA Cyclopurine adenine lesion Oxidative/UV cross-links and repair assays
Cyclopurine 8,5′-cyclo-dG Cyclopurine guanine lesion DNA damage modeling and helix-distorting repair studies
Oxidized Pyrimidine Thymidine Glycol 5,6-dihydroxy-5,6-dihydro-T Oxidative stress repair and incision studies
Oxidized Uracil 5-Hydroxy dU / 5,6-Dihydro-dU Oxidized or reduced uridine analogs Repair enzyme assays and DNA/RNA repair models
Base Damage 2′-DeoxyXanthosine Xanthine analog DNA base damage and deamination-related studies

Design note: 8-oxo lesions can increase mispairing. Place in duplex regions when measuring glycosylase specificity or polymerase bypass.

Alkylated & Adduct Lesions

mutagenesis
MGMT/MMR
opposing base
mass identity
Category Modification Description Application
Alkylated Guanine O6-Methyl-2′-deoxyguanosine Methylated guanine lesion DNA repair, mutagenesis and polymerase bypass
Alkylated Thymidine O4-Methylthymidine Methylated thymidine analog Alkylation damage models
Alkylated Cytidine N3-Methyl-dC Methylated cytidine DNA alkylation damage
Adenine Mark N6-Methyl dA Methylated adenine Epigenetics and DNA repair studies
Etheno Adduct Etheno deoxyadenosine dA Etheno adduct lesion Mutagenesis assays and adduct-response models

Design note: For polymerase bypass studies, place O6-Me-dG opposite C or T to probe miscoding behavior.

UV-Induced Lesions

NER
UV repair
flanking context
lesion identity
Category Modification Description Application
UV Dimer Cis-Syn Thymidine Dimer UV photodimer lesion NER pathway research
CPD Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimer UV-induced CPD lesion Photodamage repair and NER substrate design

Design note: Include flanking sequence context where possible to support NER recognition and repair-readout interpretation.

Abasic & AP-Site Mimics

incision steps
BER
internal placement
duplex design
Category Modification Description Application
AP Mimic dSpacer Stable abasic-site mimic DNA repair assays and AP-site modeling
Cyclic AP Mimic Pyrrolidine Cyclic abasic mimic BER mechanism analysis
AP Mimic Abasic II Stable abasic site DNA polymerase studies
RNA AP Mimic rAbasic RNA abasic-site analog RNA repair studies

Design note: Avoid placing AP-site mimics at termini; internal placement improves nuclease, ligase and incision readouts.

Epigenetic Oxidation Series

TET/BER
demethylation
strand context
matched controls
Category Modification Description Application
Cytosine Oxidation 5-Hydroxymethyl dC II Hydroxymethyl cytidine Epigenetics and BER studies
Cytosine Oxidation 5-Formyl dC III Formylated cytidine Epigenetic studies and demethylation models
Cytosine Oxidation 5-Formyl dC Formyl cytosine lesion Oxidative demethylation
Cytosine Oxidation 5-Carboxy dC Carboxylated cytidine TET-mediated oxidation

Design note: For enrichment or antibody validation, include matched unmodified controls and consider both strand contexts.

Additional Controls & Base Analogs

controls
mixed assays
comparator set
assay matching
Category Modification Description Application
Uracil Control dU (deoxyuridine) Uracil in DNA DNA metabolism and BER assays
Alkylated Control O6-Methyl dG Methylated guanine lesion Mutagenesis and repair assays
Amino Base 8-Amino-dG Amino-modified guanine DNA-protein crosslinking
Amino Base 8-Amino-dA Amino-modified adenine Mutagenesis models

Design Lesion-Containing Oligos Around the Assay Goal

The same lesion can be used differently depending on whether the goal is enzyme kinetics, assay development, toxicology or therapeutic resistance research.

Select an application goal to view design recommendations

Mechanistic repair studies usually need one defined lesion, matched duplex controls and clear enzyme-readout compatibility.

Recommended Lesions 8-oxo-dG, thymidine glycol, dU, dSpacer, Pyrrolidine, CPD and O6-Me-dG.
Typical Readout Glycosylase activity, incision, gap filling, polymerase bypass and kinetic comparison.
Design Focus Internal lesion placement, duplex stability, opposing base and enzyme-specific sequence context.

Assay development benefits from positive controls, negative controls and lesion panels matched to the detection method.

Recommended Format Lesion-positive oligos, matched unmodified controls, barcoded plates and normalized concentrations.
Typical Readout qPCR, gel shift, cleavage, mass confirmation, antibody enrichment or fluorescence-linked readout.
Design Focus Compatibility with primers, probes, ligation, PCR and detection chemistry.

Environmental and toxicology studies often require lesion panels to model oxidative, alkylation or UV-induced DNA damage.

Recommended Lesions 8-oxo-dG/dA, O6-Me-dG, O4-Me-dT, etheno dA, CPD and cyclopurines.
Typical Readout Mutagenic compound screening, genotoxicity models and repair pathway response.
Design Focus Panel consistency, lesion density, sequence context and matched controls.

Therapeutic resistance research uses lesion-containing oligos to study DNA damage response, repair pathway dependency and lesion bypass.

Recommended Lesions O6-Me-dG, UV dimers, 8-oxo-dG, AP-site mimics and bulky/helix-distorting controls.
Typical Readout Repair response, treatment resistance mechanisms, polymerase bypass and pathway preference.
Design Focus Define biological question, pathway, lesion placement and orthogonal assay controls.

Workflow for Lesion-Containing Oligos

Successful DNA damage and repair assays depend on controlled lesion placement, duplex design, purification and analytical confirmation.

01
Pathway Question

Define BER, NER, MMR, UV repair or mutagenesis readout.

02
Lesion Selection

Choose oxidized, alkylated, UV, AP-site or cytosine oxidation analog.

03
Sequence Design

Review lesion position, density, strand context and control design.

04
Synthesis

Incorporate lesion phosphoramidites or specialty analogs.

05
Purification

Use HPLC/UPLC, PAGE or method-matched cleanup.

06
QC & Delivery

Release with identity, purity, concentration, CoA and packaging.

QC Strategy for DNA Damage Oligos

Lesion-containing oligos can be sensitive to sequence context, assay placement and purification method. Bio-Synthesis supports analytical strategies matched to construct complexity and research use.

Analytical Control Matrix

QC packages may include chromatographic purity, mass identity, OD260 concentration, duplex support, custom packaging and optional documentation for transfer into regulated research workflows.

HPLC / UPLC

Purity assessment and method-matched chromatographic profile.

LC-MS

Mass identity confirmation where compatible with lesion chemistry and construct size.

OD260 / Concentration

Quantitation, normalization and formulation-ready concentration reporting.

Custom QC

Optional endotoxin, residuals, stability points, plate formatting and barcodes.

Lesion Placement Review

Internal placement, flanking sequence and opposing base considerations.

Matched Controls

Lesion-free, competitor, opposite-strand and sequence-context controls.

Scale & Packaging

Discovery µmol to larger supply, tubes, vials, plates, labels and barcodes.

Quality Support for Damage-Modified Oligos

DNA damage and repair oligonucleotides require controlled synthesis, purification and analytical release methods matched to lesion chemistry and assay use.

QMS

ISO-Supported Lesion Oligo Platform

Bio-Synthesis supports lesion selection, synthesis, purification, analytical characterization, custom packaging and documentation for DNA damage and repair oligonucleotide programs.

ISO 9001:2015 Quality management system
ISO 13485:2016 Medical-device quality framework
Analytical QC HPLC/UPLC, LC-MS, OD260 and CoA
Custom Programs Lesion panels, controls, plates and documentation

FAQ

Which lesions should I start with?
Common starting points are 8-oxo-dG for oxidative BER, O6-Me-dG for alkylation and mutagenesis, dSpacer or Pyrrolidine for AP-site models, and CPD or cis-syn TT for UV/NER studies.
How should lesions be positioned?
Most repair assays use internal lesion placement with sufficient flanking sequence. Terminal placement can affect nuclease, ligase, polymerase and repair-enzyme readouts.
Do I need matched unmodified controls?
Yes. Include lesion-free duplexes, sequence-matched controls, competitor substrates and opposing-base controls when interpreting repair specificity or kinetics.
What QC is recommended?
HPLC/UPLC purity, LC-MS identity where compatible, OD260 concentration and CoA are common. Additional testing can be added based on scale and application.
Can Bio-Synthesis provide plate-based lesion panels?
Yes. Tubes, vials and plates with labels, barcodes, concentration normalization and CoA documentation can be supported for screening workflows.
What information is needed for a quote?
 Provide sequence, lesion type, position, duplex or single-strand format, scale, purification, QC requirements, controls and intended assay/readout.

Information Helpful for Lesion-Containing Oligos

Pathway
BER, NER, MMR, UV repair
Sequence
5′→3′ and lesion position
Lesion
8-oxo, O6-Me, CPD, AP
Format
ssDNA, duplex, panel
Scale
nmol, µmol, mg
QC
HPLC, LC-MS, CoA

Need help choosing lesions or designing a repair assay?

Share your sequence, lesion type, desired position, repair pathway, matched controls, scale, purification and QC needs. Bio-Synthesis can help evaluate manufacturability and build a lesion-containing oligo workflow around your assay.
BER

Repair Pathway Review

Compare BER, NER, UV damage, mutagenesis and AP-site models.

8-oxo O6-Me CPD dSpacer
QC

Release Package

Purification, LC-MS, analytical purity, concentration, labeling and documentation.

HPLC LC-MS CoA Custom QC

Recommended Reading & Literature References

Use this section to support scientific credibility while keeping the page focused on lesion selection, synthesis, assay design and analytical verification.

  1. Lindahl T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature. 1993.
  2. Sancar A. Structure and function of DNA photolyase and cryptochrome blue-light photoreceptors. Chemical Reviews. 2003.
  3. Reardon JT, Sancar A. Recognition and repair of the cyclobutane thymine dimer. Genes & Development. 2003.
  4. Nilsen H, Krokan HE. Base excision repair in a network of defence and tolerance. Carcinogenesis. 2001.
  5. Prakash S, Prakash L. Nucleotide excision repair in yeast. Mutation Research. 2000.

Suggested page note: References are provided for scientific background. Final lesion oligo design should be evaluated within the sequence, lesion position, pathway, assay readout, purification method and QC requirements.

Why Choose Bio-Synthesis

Trusted by biotech leaders worldwide for over 45+ years of delivering high quality, fast and scalable synthetic biology solutions.